I'd rather a complicated system that delivers a better democratic result than a simple system that fails to represent more than half of voters. Besides, if the naysayers are claiming BC-STV to be too "complicated," "confusing," even "baffling" to them, why should anyone believe their interpretation of that system?
Subject heading of a follow-up comment from a naysayer:
Spoken like a true banker/mortgage lender.
Gotta go! My stockbroker's calling!
Recommend this post
